A Match made in Heaven. Walmart teams up with Hoe-land security

admin Post in News, Politics, Rants and stuff dude..., Terrorism
Comments Off

This is the dumbest thing I have ever heard.

By Chris Morran on December 7, 2010 10:20 AM

In a move that makes virtually no sense whatsoever, the Department of Homeland Security has announced a partnership with Walmart “to help the American public play an active role in ensuring the safety and security of our nation.”

From the DHS website, which we are pretty sure has not been hijacked by the editors of The Onion:

“The “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign—originally implemented by New York City’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority and funded, in part, by $13 million from DHS’ Transit Security Grant Program—is a simple and effective program to engage the public and key frontline employees to identify and report indicators of terrorism, crime and other threats to the proper transportation and law enforcement authorities ”

 

“Homeland security starts with hometown security, and each of us plays a critical role in keeping our country and communities safe,” said DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. “This partnership will help millions of shoppers across the nation identify and report indicators of terrorism, crime and other threats to law enforcement authorities.”

Napolitano will also appear in a video that will run at select checkout counters. The Secretary somehow manages to stave off a smile as she tells shoppers to alert Walmart managers to possible threats of terrorism.

Secretary Napolitano Announces Expansion of “If You See Something, Say Something” Campaign to Walmart Stores Across the Nation [DHS.gov]

Now the US Government tell us what we can and can’t read?

admin Post in Conspiracy, News, Politics
Comments Off

Students warned: Read WikiLeaks and you’re out of a government job

By Daniel Tencer
Sunday, December 5th, 2010 — 12:17 pm

Graduate students at US universities are being warned not to read or post links to WikiLeaks documents, or they could be denied work with the US government.

Several news reports suggest the State Department has been warning university departments that students could fail security screening if they are seen to discuss or post links to WikiLeaks documents on social networking sites. The US government considers the leaked material to be classified, even after public release.

AboveTheLaw.com has obtained a letter from the career development dean of the Boston University School of Law warning students to stay away from WikiLeaks material.

Today I received information about Wikileaks that I want to pass on to you. This is most relevant if you are going to apply for or have already applied for federal government positions. Two big factors in hiring for many federal government positions are determining if the applicants have good judgment and if they know how to deal with confidential/classified information. The documents released by Wikileaks remain classified; thus, reading them, passing them on, commenting on them may be seen as a violation of Executive Order 13526, Classified National Security Information. See Section 5.5 (Sanctions).

For many federal government jobs, applicants must obtain security clearances. There are various levels of security checks, but all federal positions require background checks. As part of such checks, social media may be researched to see what you are up to, so DO NOT post links to the documents or make comments on any social media sites. Moreover, polygraphs are conducted for the highest levels of security clearance.

I have not yet heard any fallout about specific individuals, but we wanted to give you this take on the situation.

Maura Kelly
Assistant Dean for Career Development and Public Service

DemocracyNow’s Amy Goodman obtained a copy of a similar letter sent by the office of career services at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs.

“The documents released during the past few months through Wikileaks are still considered classified documents. [A State Department official] recommends that you DO NOT post links to these documents nor make comments on social media sites such as Facebook or through Twitter. Engaging in these activities would call into question your ability to deal with confidential information, which is part of most positions with the federal government,” the letter stated.

Susie Madrak at Crooks and Liars likens the US government’s efforts to prevent federal employees and prospective employees from reading the leaks to a game of “whack-a-mole,” a view shared by AboveTheLaw’s Elie Mystal:

Basically, I don’t think the federal government is even competent enough to find all the Wikileaks readers and blacklist them from the federal payroll. I mean, if the FBI or CIA or whatever really was the kind of omnipresent force idealized in movies, tell me how Julian Assange is still alive, much less in a position to publish thousands of confidential documents.

The news comes as the US government has been placing pressure on its employees to stay away from the leaks.

“The recent disclosure of US government documents by WikiLeaks has resulted in damage to our national security,” the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) said in a message to all federal agencies.

It reminded them that “each federal employee and contractor is obligated to protect classified information” and said that a public release of classified documents did not mean they had been declassified.

“Unauthorized disclosures of classified documents (whether in print, on a blog or on websites) do not alter the documents’ classified status or automatically result in declassification of the documents,” the OMB said.

Reporting on the government’s efforts to stop employees from reading the leaked materials, the New York Times describes it as “a classic case of shutting the barn door after the horse has left.”

Dancing with the Stars is a farce

admin Post in News, Politics, Rants and stuff dude...
0

It is obvious that Danicng with the Palins…err..Stars, has -0-, nothing, nadda, to do with talent. Dump the fat girl because she cannot dance. This show has been removed from our weekly lineup. Jennifer Grey should prepare to get screwed by the tea party palinites.

Rick Sanchez Fired from CNN

admin Post in News, Politics
0

First it was Lou Dobbs, now it’s Rick Sanchez. Seems that racial comments are the unjewing..err….the un doing of all the good CNN hosts. Why even watch CNN anymore? All the good hosts are gone.

Guess this is a good lesson for all the hosts on the major news netwoks….Don’t mess with the Jews dude, they don’t take it will and will cut your throat. Of course that is nothing new either.

The Dr. Laura Dustup

admin Post in News, Politics, Rants and stuff dude...
0

I don’t like Dr. Laura. I think she is a  bitch and always has been. It does not bother me at all that she has decided to get off the airwaves, it’s saves me from having to listen to her as I travel across the fruited plain, searching for a radio station that doesn’t have crappy programming.

With that being said, this story about her being racist has gotten on my last nerve. I heard the call, both sides of the conversation. While Dr. Laura is still a bitch, I didn’t see or hear that she was being racist at ALL! No, what I heard was her being tired of other people always claiming racism. Dr. Laura has been railroaded simply because she could be. Dr. L opened herself up to a media slam because she used the word nigger. Oops…oh my…wait, the world didn’t end. Whew…OK, on with the story.

The fact is people are way to sensitive, included CNN for the story and the way they ran the story about Dr. L. I’m tired of it, move on. The word has no power in a modern generation. We no longer class people by color. We are all brothers in the world and the struggle to survive is just that, everyone’s struggle. Unless your talking about Muslims then all bets are off. Cause dem mudda fukkers is fo sho SandNiggas!!!….LOL Have a sense of humor eh?

How about this, go about your life and leave everyone else alone. See if that doesn’t work better for everyone. I promise you, life will be better. Next item.

Mayor Daley lays out strict gun rules for Chicago – Daley is Scum

admin Post in News, Politics, Rants and stuff dude...
0

Mayor Richard Daley of Chicago is Scum. The un-safest City in America goes one step further.

CHICAGO (AP) – With the city’s gun ban certain to be overturned, Mayor Richard Daley on Thursday introduced what city officials say is the strictest handgun ordinance in the United States.

The measure, which draws from ordinances around the country, would ban gun shops in Chicago and prohibit gun owners from stepping outside their homes, even onto their porches or garages, with a handgun.

Daley announced his ordinance at a park on the city’s South Side three days after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Americans have a right to own a gun for self-defense anywhere they live. The City Council is expected to vote on it Friday.

“As long as I’m mayor, we will never give up or give in to gun violence that continues to threaten every part of our nation, including Chicago,” said Daley, who was flanked by activists, city officials and the parents of a teenager whose son was shot and killed on a city bus while shielding a friend.

The ordinance, which Daley urged the City Council to pass, also would :

- Limit the number of handguns residents can register to one per month and prohibit residents from having more than one handgun in operating order at any given time.

- Require residents in homes with children to keep them in lock boxes or equipped with trigger locks.

- Require prospective gun owners to take a four-hour class and one-hour training at a gun range. They would have to leave the city for training because Chicago prohibits new gun ranges and limits the use of existing ranges to police officers. Those restrictions were similar to those in an ordinance passed in Washington, D.C., after the high court struck down its ban two years ago.

- Prohibit people from owning a gun if they were convicted of a violent crime, domestic violence or two or more convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Residents convicted of a gun offense would have to register with the police department.

- Calls for the police department to maintain a registry of every handgun owner in the city, with the names and addresses to be made available to police officers, firefighters and other emergency responders.

Those who already have handguns in the city – which has been illegal since the city’s ban was approved 28 years ago – would have 90 days to register those weapons, according to the proposed ordinance.

Residents convicted of violating the city’s ordinance can face a fine up to $5,000 and be locked up for as long as 90 days for a first offense and a fine of up to $10,000 and as long as six months behind bars for subsequent convictions.

“We’ve gone farther than anyone else ever has,” said Corporation Counsel Mara Georges.

Still, the mayor, whose office is trying to craft an ordinance that will withstand legal challenges, had to back off some provisions he’d hoped to include, including requiring gun owners to insure their weapons and restricting each resident to one handgun.

Georges said it would be expensive for homeowners to include guns on their homeowners’ and renters’ insurance policies, so such a requirement could be seen as being discriminatory to the city’s poorer residents. Limiting the number of handguns could be seen as discriminatory to people who owned weapons before the city’s ban went into effect in 1982 or before they moved into the city.

“We can limit the place in which those handguns can be located,” she said, before adding a not-so-veiled swipe at the court: “For instance, the Supreme court does not want them coming into the courthouse.”

Still, Daley indicated that no matter what was included in the ordinance, he expects legal challenges.

“Everybody has a right to sue,” he said